Editing | A whistlestop tour of my editing process | Lia Marus
This article details how I approach the task of editing a piece of work and my philosophy that I adopt in this process.
editor, editing, edit, grammar, rewrite, rewriting
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-571,single-format-standard,qode-listing-1.0.3,qode-social-login-1.0.1,qode-news-1.0.2,qode-quick-links-1.0,qode-restaurant-1.0.2,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-title-hidden,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-14.0,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.7,vc_responsive
How I approach editing

How I edit

As an editor, one of the challenges that one is often faced with is the extent to which one should edit a person’s work. Should one only correct the grammar and typos or is it permissible to rewrite sections of the text? What is the extent to which you should be editing.

This is a difficult one and there’s much debate as to what the correct treatment of a text should be. Some clients will ask for a proofread but what the text really requires is a reordering of the structure – a dramatic piece of editing – as well as attention to typos and grammar.

Personally, I like to err on the side of caution and not perform a radical edit, unless the client has give me licence to do so. The first thing that goes through my mind before  I tackle a piece of editing is:  “If this were my text, how would I want it to be edited?” Remember: a piece of writing is like the author’s biological baby. They’ve give birth to it,  moulded it  and it’s a reflection of them. A ruthless editor feels like a murderer as it tears apart their creation, and by default themselves.

If it’s a piece of writing for a company  – be it as lengthy as a press release or as short as a social media post – that I’ve produced on instruction from said institution I default to the company style and the image that the company wants to portray. If they don’t like what I’ve written, and end up rewriting it themselves, I don’t take it personally that they’ve taken it upon themselves to write what I was tasked with. They are the client and they know what’s best for their company. They know what image they want to portray. It’s not up to me to decide.

I find that the trick to being an editor is not to become too emotionally involved with your work. I feel that being an editor is a teeny bit like a doctor – without the added pressure of holding an actual person’s life in your hands because just as a doctor is responsible for making someone better so is an editor responsible for bringing an added dimension to the text that the author would have never thought possible.

No Comments

Post A Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.